Screening against official U.S. government lists — in the same evidence trail.

What it produces

• Screening results per covered individual, scoped to the lists applicable to the certification at hand, and integrated into the disclosure verification record — matches surfaced as exceptions, no-matches recorded as verified.
• Re-check as the lists change. Different lists serve different obligations — sanctions, export controls, federal exclusions. A screen that clears at award and is never revisited leaves the institution asserting yesterday's answer to today's question.
• An audit record per screen. Which list was checked, on what date, and what it returned — captured with the certification, not stored in a separate log.

What it does not do

Screening runs against official U.S. government lists — we do not author or maintain a private registry of individuals and never will. The list of prohibited or restricted parties is a federal responsibility; our job is to check against it accurately, integrate the result into the certification trail, and re-check as the lists change.

Which lists

U.S. government-published restricted-party and exclusion lists relevant to research awards — including but not limited to the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals List, the BIS Entity List, the SAM.gov exclusion records, and the ITAR debarment list, as applicable to the certification at hand. The specific list set is determined by the certification being made, not by the institution's guess.