- An executive sponsor — VP for Research, Chief Research Officer, or equivalent.
- A working session cadence — regular time with the team building the platform.
- Real data connections for a scoped researcher cohort — enough to run verification against actual compliance reality.
- Candid feedback — including on what doesn't work yet.
Shape the platform. Lead the category.
We are building the verification layer for research security with a small cohort of founding partner institutions — not hundreds of logos, a handful of serious programs. Founding partners run the platform against their own researchers and workflows, meet directly with the team building it, and set the roadmap's priorities. In return they receive preferred multi-year terms and first access to every capability we ship.
- Disclosure Verification, deployed in production against your institution's real compliance workflows.
- Preferred multi-year terms.
- Roadmap influence — direct input on what ships next.
- Co-authored case study only if and when you choose (approval-gated, never automatic).
Institutions certifying federal research disclosures.
Research universities, academic medical centers, and independent research institutes — especially those standing up NSPM-33 research security programs now. The program is designed for institutions where research compliance is a strategic priority and where the leadership wants a verification instrument, not another form-collection product.
Apply — request a briefing.
A short form: name, role, institution, the disclosure system you use, current research security program status. If there is a fit, we will schedule 30 minutes with the team.